Biosafety – Sharing Data for Compliance

When we were building the Biosafety Protocols module of TOPAZ Elements many years ago, we spent time talking to some of the NIH officials who, at the time, were working to implement the audit program for institutions receiving NIH funding.  The primary messages were clear and simple;

  • The IBC should have it’s own protocol form, not “piggy back” on the IACUC or IRB form.
  • The committees should communicate!
  • It should be easy to search for protocols based on some very simple criteria – BSL level and Guideline Section at minimum

As a result, we were carful to ensure that the Elements implementation of the Biosafety Protocols module accommodated these requirements.  It is its own module, with its own forms and lists.  The PI is able to tie together the Biosafety protocol with its sibling animal or human protocols as part of the request, and the committee can then check on status, protocol content and even meeting dates for their colleague committees.  And the very powerful searching capabilities built into Elements (for example, in the Protocol Histories screen) make it easy to select protocols based on the requests of auditors, by BSL level, Guideline Section or many other parameters.

Like the other Protocol modules, the system retains all the comments, review assignments, meeting minutes and status selections for all versions of the protocol, with reports that are specifically designed for handing to your NIH or other auditors.

It is true that several TOPAZ customers use other vendors’ solutions for their IBC or IRB protocols modules, and we support this through a variety of integration strategies, but in following this path, you lose both the compliance benefits described above, and the usability benefits that come from having a consistent look and feel for the PIs, administrators and committee members.  Applying a consistent “3 Is” approach to the software selection across your committees can bring some significant benefits

You May Also Like…

Clarifying the Reporting Requirements

Clarifying the Reporting Requirements

It's Important to stay aware The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (OLAW) released its “Request for Information (RFI) on Clarifying the Reporting Requirements for Departures from the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory...

How does Health Check Work?

How does Health Check Work?

In our last blog post, we detailed the importance of conducting regular Health Checks. This week, we will take a look at the different ways that a Health Check can be done, as well as other factors that should be considered when evaluating your processes.   What is a...

The Importance of Regular Software Health Checks

The Importance of Regular Software Health Checks

Purchasing laboratory management software may seem like the obvious fix for an institution’s productivity. Robust software that streamlines processes and improves workflow are highly valued and touted as a must-have for any organization with an animal research...